Is 'Serverless' the next big flop?

Is 'Serverless' the next big flop?

Conor O'Neill
Conor O'Neill Technical Lead

“Serverless” is being touted as the Next Big Thing in enterprise-level computing, but is it really just the next big flop?
What does “Serverless” mean, anyway? Well, obviously there is a ‘server’ somewhere which is running your functionality. But essentially this means that the whole execution environment is provided for you. You don’t need to worry about ‘hosting’, or ‘app servers’, operating systems, or similar. The code is executed on some anonymous server, which is provided by a major computing provider.

Isn’t this the same as the “Cloud”?

Almost, but it goes a step further. The user (and the developer) doesn’t care about the infrastructure at all. The developer provides some stateless code, and the code execution is triggered by an external event, such as a user pressing a button on a web page. This is why Serverless is also known as “Function as a Service” (FaaS).

How can something be 'stateless'?

Doesn’t everything need to hold some state? Yes. But all of the state is stored explicitly in the application’s database. There is no state held within the application code itself. This continues a trend which has been happening for many years, where the application holds zero state, and this makes it easier to scale an application to handle very large loads.

So what are the benefits?

Essentially, this reduces the operational complexity of the system. The developer only has to worry about the functionality, not about the implementation detail about how and where this functionality is executed. Again, this is a continuation of a trend through recent years to higher-level abstractions in computer languages and environments such as web servers.

How does it handle peaks of load? The answer is that you don’t need to care. The Serverless provider automatically scales their back-end systems up and down to handle as much load as necessary. The mechanics of how this works are completely abstracted away from you.
How much does it cost? Essentially, you only pay for the functionality when it is actually running, so the cost scales alongside the load. There is no payment for idle time, or hosting.

There are examples of Serverless in operation right now: Amazon AWS Lambda was an early leader, and there are also Microsoft Azure with Azure Functions, Google Cloud with Google Cloud Functions, and others.


So, to answer the original question, is this the Next Big Thing, or is it the Next Big Flop?

I believe that it is definitely the Next Big Thing - it continues the trend towards commoditisation of the computing infrastructure. The enterprise has moved from deployed systems in-premise, through into hosting, Virtual Machines (VM's), The Cloud, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), and Platform as a Service (PaaS). The Serverless systems will be used for very many widely deployed user applications, and for the ‘backend’ functionality behind lots of “Internet of Things” systems.

Conor O'Neill
Conor O'Neill
Technical Lead

We think you'll also enjoy

Why Having Product Designers and Developers In The Same Team Gives You Big Benefits

Our Lead Product Designer, Andrew, explores the benefits of having product designers and developers in the same team, and how it contributes to the overall success of a product.
Learn more

Why investing in innovation during 2023 will set you up to thrive post-recession

How can you set your business up to weather the recession, and to be in a position to thrive when the country returns to growth? This blog looks at why 2023 needs to be the year of business and technology housekeeping
Learn more

Tackling cyber security – a people problem?

Concerns about the security of IT infrastructure and applications have grown steadily year on year in this blog post we share insights from Bristol companies on the steps they take to protect their organisation’s reputation and day-to-day productivity.
Learn more

Subscribe to our newsletter

The latest news and industry insights, straight to your inbox